Re Mitt Wearables- Part 1 Inconsistent Agreements: The pitfalls and how to avoid them

Re Mitt Wearables- Part 1 Inconsistent Agreements: The pitfalls and how to avoid them

In July 2023, judgment was given in the case of Re Mitt Wearables, an unfair prejudice petition brought under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006. Laytons ETL acted for Koalaa Ltd (the innovative designer and manufacturer of soft sleeve prosthetics), one of the successful respondents to the petition.

Moving to England: Part 2 - Recognition of foreign prenuptial agreements

Moving to England: Part 2 - Recognition of foreign prenuptial agreements

Nuptial agreements can help with the division of assets and income on separation or divorce, and although they have been more commonly been associated with certain jurisdictions like the United States, their popularity is growing globally, including in European countries such as Spain, Italy and Germany. 

Moving to England: Part 1 - navigating European matrimonial property regimes

Moving to England: Part 1 - navigating European matrimonial property regimes

Plotting a course through matrimonial issues and across international borders can be complex at the best of times, especially when dealing with legal systems that differ significantly in their approach. Your ship might cast off in the right direction, but where is the final destination?

Unfair Prejudice Petitions at risk of time-bar

Unfair Prejudice Petitions at risk of time-bar

Unfair prejudice petitions under s.994 Companies Act 2006 are a key way for minority shareholders to pursue claims when their interests have been adversely affected by the conduct of the majority.  However, until very recently, there was considerable doubt as to whether claims brought in this way by minority shareholders could be time-barred under the provisions of the Limitation Act 1980, and, if so, how.  The received wisdom was that they probably couldn’t be.